Science and Pseudoscience
The methods and findings of science can seem mysterious to lay
audiences. The whole enerprise is viewed with suspicion in some quarters,
given the propensity of many in the media to present scientific findings
as a sort of
non-divine revelation. On the other hand, everyone understands that in
our culture statements are true to the extent they can be described as
scientific. This fact makes it easy for
charlatans to coopt the language of science to promote favored political
agendas.
Particularly insidious is the use of pseudoscience by many on the
political right to
justify narrow religious dogmas. Thus, we are treated to an endless
barrage of claims that new findings in cosmology or biology prove God's
existence, or that materialistic science has become obsolete. These claims
are silly, but when presented in suitably technical dress they can appear
impressive. The support of intelligent-design theory as an
alternative to Darwin's theory of evolution is the latest example. Among
professionals, intelligent-design is rejected owing to the manifest
falseness of its arguments, coupled with its inability to produce useful
results in day-to-day scientific work. ID's political defenders do not
care about such things, however, and prefer to present Darwinism as
dogmatic atheism in a lab coat. Such rhetoric is useful for arousing the
emotions of lay audiences, but they have no connection with reality.
Many professionals respond to pseudoscience by ignoring it. This is a
mistake, if for no other reason than the fact that funding decisions are
made by politicians, who must be sensitive to their constituents, many of
whom take pseudoscientific ideas very seriously indeed. It is not a good
thing that a phony psychic passing off simple parlor tricks as
communication with the dead has one of the highest rated shows on
television. Nor is it good that many learn what they know of modern
science from right-wing showmen like Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity
(who once shamelessly described Darwinism as "liberal science".)
Ultimately, the only way to defeat such nonsense is to confront it
vigorously.
Essays
- Dembski, Darwin and Devils Book reviews of
The Design Revolution by William Dembski, God, the Devil and Darwin by Niall Shanks and Darwinisn,
Design and Public Education edited by J. Cambpell and S. Meyer
Skeptic, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2004, pp. 79-84.
- How do ID Proponents Behave When Preaching to
the Choir? Detailed description of the goings-on at an
Intelligent-Design Conference.
Skeptic, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2003. pp. 14-17.
- Wrong Questions, No Answers
Book review of The Right Questions by Phillip Johnson
Skeptic, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2003. pp. 86-88.
- Leaders and Followers in the
Intelligent-Design Movement Editorial describing my
experiences at an Intelligent-Design conference.
BioScience, Vol. 53, No. 1, January 2003, pp. 6-7.
- Probability, Optimization Theory, and Evolution
Book review of No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity
Cannot be Purchased Without Intelligence by William Dembski.
Evolution, Vol. 56, No. 8, August 2002, pp.1721-1722
- Does Theology Have Any Content?
Book review of Why Religion Matters: The Fate of the Human Spirit
in an Age of Disbelief by Huston Smith.
Free Inquiry, Vol. 22, No. 4, Fall 2002, pp. 66.
- On Science and Pseudoscience
Book Reviews of Science or Pseudoscience: Magnetic Healing, Psychic
Phenomena, and Other Heterodoxies by Henry Bauer and The
Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense by Michael Shermer.
The Humanist, September/October 2001, Vol 61, No 5, pp. 32-33.
- The Design Detectives Book
Reviews of Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and
Theology by William Dembski and The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the
Foundations of Naturalism by Phillip Johnson.
Skeptic, Vol 8, No 4, 2001, pp. 59-64.
- How Anti-Evolutionists Abuse Mathematics  
Lengthy letter to the editor describing fallacious mathematical arguments
used by critics of evolutionary theory.
The Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol. 23, No. 4, Fall 2001, pp. 3-8.
- God and Darwin Book Reviews
of Finding Darwin's God: A Scientist's Search for Common Ground Between
God and Evolution by Kenneth R. Miller and God After Darwin: A
Theology of Evolution by
John F. Haught.
Skeptic, Vol 8, No. 2, 2000, pp. 84-88.
Anti-Pseudoscience Sites
- National Center for Science
Education   Dedicated to preserving the teaching of
evolution in public schools.
- The Skeptics Society
Publishers of Skeptic Magazine.
- TalkOrigins.org
Excellent
collection of articles refuting every aspect of creationist pseudoscience.
- CSICOP Home Page
Publishers of
The Skeptical Inquirer magazine.
- Massimo
Pigliucci's Web Site
Rationalist and humanist web site maintained by a
prominent
evolutionary biologist.